MAIN
 ·ABOUT US
 ·JOB OPPORTUNITY
 ·GUESTBOOK
 ·CONTACT
 ·OUR BANNERS
 ·REPUBLISH
 ·CHANGE COLOUR
  NEW PW
 ·REPORTS
 ·INTERVIEWS
 ·WEEKLY REVIEW
 ·ANALYSIS
 ·COMMENTARY
 ·OPINION
 ·ESSAYS
 ·DEBATE
 ·OTHER ARTICLES
  CHECHNYA
 ·BASIC INFO
 ·SOCIETY
 ·MAPS
 ·BIBLIOGRAPHY
  HUMAN RIGHTS
 ·ATTACKS ON DEFENDERS
 ·REPORTS
 ·SUMMARY REPORTS
  HUMANITARIAN
 ·PEOPLE
 ·ENVIRONMENT
  MEDIA
 ·MEDIA ACCESS
 ·INFORMATION WAR
  POLITICS
 ·CHECHNYA
 ·RUSSIA
 ·THE WORLD'S RESPONSE
  CONFLICT INFO
 ·NEWS SUMMARIES
 ·CASUALTIES
 ·MILITARY
  JOURNAL
 ·ABOUT JOURNAL
 ·ISSUES
  RFE/RL BROADCASTS
 ·ABOUT BROADCASTS
  LINKS

CHECHNYA LINKS LIBRARY

November 29th 2001 · The Guardian · PRINTER FRIENDLY FORMAT · E-MAIL THIS

Robertson: High moral tone over the Afghan war - letter to the editor

Criticism by Sheila Malone and Bruce Kent of my attitude to Russian policy in Chechnya (Letters, November 28) is based on a selective and misleading characterisation of my speech in Moscow. I did say we have "come to see the scourge of terrorism in Chechnya with different eyes", and, given what we learn daily about the role in Afghanistan of some Chechens in the Taliban and al-Qaida, I am not the only one who has thought this.*

It is totally wrong to dismiss what I also said in the speech, that we "disagree on the means Russia has chosen in the handling of that conflict", with specific reference to the handling of civilians. Their letter also ignores what I said in Volgograd: "We must also continue to express our deep concern, not about the goals of Russia's operation in Chechnya, but about the means used, and their effects on innocent civilians."**

Relations with Russia are moving to a new level, but that does not mean we cannot or will not criticise each other. As I further said: "We will continue to have differences, but we must discuss them openly."

Their quotes are ill-suited to the high moral tone they seek to adopt.

George Robertson
Secretary general, Nato

SEARCH
  

[advanced search]

 © 2000-2025 Prague Watchdog  (see Reprint info).
The views expressed on this web site are the authors' own, and don't necessarily reflect the views of Prague Watchdog,
which aims to present a wide spectrum of opinion and analysis relating to events in the North Caucasus.
Advertisement