Judd: Chechen dialogue must go onIn his first interview since stepping down as Council of Europe rapporteur
on Chechnya, Lord Judd tells IWPR the political dialogue sponsored by the
body must continue.
By Thomas de Waal in London (CRS No.172, 27-March-03)
Lord Judd, who resigned as special rapporteur to the Parliamentary
Assembly of the Council of Europe on March 23, said he wants to see it
sponsor a new broad political conference that would include Chechen rebel
fighters.
The British peer formally proposed the idea before stepping down in
protest at Moscow's refusal to postpone its constitutional referendum in
Chechnya. It will be discussed at the council's parliamentary assembly
session next week.
"The council should organise a seminar or a hearing which should involve
the widest possible cross-section of people, including those Chechen
fighters that are prepared to come, to discuss the political process and
how it can be moved forward," Lord Judd said in an interview this week at
the House of Lords in London.
He said the timing and location of the event should be flexible: it was
more important that it was "broad-based" and included many different
parties in the dispute.
Since the beginning of the second Chechen war in 1999, the
Strasbourg-based Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe has been
the most active international body monitoring the conflict. Russia has
been a member since 1996.
Lord Judd, a former Labour member of parliament and director of the
charity Oxfam, took up the job of rapporteur in November 1999 and made
frequent trips to Chechnya.
He drew criticism both from the Russians for his trenchant criticisms of
their policies and from some human rights activists who said he was not
paying enough attention to the human rights situation. Instead, he made
political dialogue a priority. Two years ago, he tried to arrange talks in
Strasbourg, involving representatives of Aslan Maskhadov's rebel
government, which failed at the eleventh hour.
But his broad-church approach came under strain when Moscow decided to
hold a constitutional referendum in Chechnya on March 23.
The new constitution, which declares the republic unequivocally to be part
of the Russian Federation, has provoked controversy both in Chechnya
itself and Moscow. No international body, including the Council of Europe,
sent observers to monitor it.
This week the Russian authorities declared that of the 90 per cent of
Chechnya's electorate that allegedly turned out for the vote, a massive 96
per cent had approved the new constitution.
President Vladimir Putin hailed the outcome and said the referendum had
"resolved the last serious problem relating to Russia's territorial
integrity". He promised to speed up reconstruction work in Chechnya.
However, few have accepted the validity of the vote, as opponents had
called for a boycott and journalists reported low activity at polling
stations. In one of many suspicious results, the traditional militant
region of Vedeno, homeland to Chechen radical warrior Shamil Basayev, was
said to have delivered an overwhelming "yes" vote for the new
constitution.
After his last visit to Chechnya in January, Judd declared that it was
premature to hold a referendum there without holding a proper debate about
the political alternatives. He told the council's parliamentary assembly
he would step down if the vote went ahead - a decision which took effect
on March 23.
"The way in which the Russians went berserk when I announced that I was
going to step down, I think completely proved to me that my decision was
right," Judd told IWPR.
He says he is worried that Moscow will now use the adoption of the
referendum as an excuse to reject other political initiatives.
"Of course it could make [the situation in Chechnya] more difficult
because it will reinforce the Russian arrogance, plus the fact that they
will say they've got the authority now, plus the fact that as this war
goes on and the deals that are being done on the war - the tacit deals -
carry on, they don't feel much international pressure."
The council's parliamentary assembly has yet to decide if it will appoint
a new rapporteur to replace Lord Judd. But he said he was pleased that
Chechnya was now on "the mainstream agenda" of three of the assembly's
committees.
Rudolf Bindig, a German member, of the Legal Affairs and Human Rights
Committee, infuriated the Russians early this month when he argued for an
international tribunal to be set up to deal with war crimes committed in
Chechnya.
Before the referendum, Peter Schieder, president of the parliamentary
assembly, also wrote in the Moscow newspaper Izvestia that the human
rights situation in Chechnya was "deplorable" and that "the Russian
authorities must do much more than what they have been doing so far, and
do it immediately, if they want the people of Chechnya to trust and
participate in the political process the referendum is meant to launch".
Judd said that he believed the council - which is the oldest working
pan-European institution - was keeping Chechnya on Europe's agenda. Of his
proposed conference he said, "I think it is something the Council of
Europe can do, just provide a framework to which more people can come than
might to other occasions."
On the controversial point of inviting rebel fighters he argued, "Among
those fighters there are different elements and there are those who are
fighting for what you and I recognise as political objectives.
"There are others who are fighting for Jihad, for militant Islam and for
nothing that you or I would recognise as a political objective. Don't
strengthen their hands! The others have got to be won back into the
political process."
Judd said that he will continue to engage with Chechnya but as an
"ordinary member" of the parliamentary assembly. As well as being attacked
for his stand in Moscow, he said he had got many messages of support from
Russian colleagues.
Several times in the interview, the departing rapporteur repeated that he
sincerely hoped Moscow's latest political strategy for Chechnya would
work, but that everything he had seen in the republic convinced him it
would not.
"God knows one what one wants is peace and some safety for the people of
Chechnya. I just hope that I'm proved totally wrong and the Russians are
right, that my doubts and cynicisms are totally unfounded - but I can't
see I've reached that point."
Thomas de Waal is IWPR's Caucasus Editor.
This article originally appeared in the Caucasus Reporting Service, produced by the Institute for War and Peace Reporting, http://www.iwpr.net. (T) |